Articles Rants & Raves Lighten Up, Francis
 

Lighten Up, Francis Hot

 

I write a game review site, like about every other fourth gamer nerd on the planet. So I feel qualified to make unreasonable assumptions about people I haven't met, because I must be an expert - I write a game review site. And one thing I feel compelled to note is that gamers take this gaming crap way too seriously - me included.

 

 

Two of the last three games I reviewed were games that are commonly labeled Euros. Darjeeling and Oregon are both Rio Grande games invented by people who, if they spoke English at all, almost certainly used it as a second (or third) language. Being as I am too ignorant to speak more than one language, I like to poke fun at Europeans to make me feel better about myself, kind of like NASCAR fans who make fun of people who play polo (real polo, on horses, not water polo - everyone makes fun of people who play water polo). So my reviews of the games indicated two things: first, that taken merely as games, they were both pretty good, and second, that the themes were way too watery for my uncultured American tastes.



In my never-ending quest to get more people to pay attention to me, I posted both reviews at BGG. And I found out something that did not surprise me at all - people were not always happy with me. I managed to offend some gay rights activists, some hardcore Euro gamers, and at least one Norwegian. All of these people were irritated with me for saying bad things about games they liked (except the Norwegian - he was displeased because I called Norwegians peaceniks). Of course, I was at BGG, so I'm not sure what I was expecting - pointing out that Darjeeling, a game about collecting tea, is about as manly as wearing a skirt and buying open-toe sandals, may strike a little too close to home.



I would like to say that only hardcore Euro nerds are this filled with high anxiety, but that would be a biased lie. For one thing, I have enjoyed countless Euro games, and will generally play anything Rio Grande Games ever produces. For another thing, Ameritrashers are just as guilty of taking themselves too seriously. They just do it in a completely different way.



The difference is, Euro games tend to think that they are smarter than people who want their games to include bloodshed. Ameritrash fans, on the other hand, think that Euro gamers are square-headed stuffed shirts who wouldn't know fun if it bit off their tiny peckers. For the most part, both groups are wrong, and they even know they're wrong, but good luck getting them to admit it.



However, even if you're not firmly in one camp or the other - and I'm not, I love Risk and Settlers of Catan, Descent and Dungeon Twister, Battlelore and To Court the King - even if you can play any game based solely on the enjoyment you're having at the time, if you're a serious gamer, you probably take games way too seriously.



You can probably discuss games and compare them based on their mechanics. You probably know what I mean when I say mechanic, for that matter. You may or may not use the word 'elegant' when describing a game, but you're still able to evaluate it based on the complexity of the rules.



I'm actually not going to say there's anything wrong with taking games seriously, especially because I'm more guilty of it than most people. I did mention I write a game review site, right? If you love games, you take them seriously. When you're deciding whether to drop fifty clams for a box of plastic bits and a cardboard map of Poland, you want to know whether you could enjoy the game or not. Comparing it to other games you know you love or hate will help you make that purchase, and if you do make the purchase, you'll be more able to persuade friends to play with you.



But you can get a little overboard. I mean, it's one thing to like model trains; it's another thing entirely to have a full-scale steam engine driving around the basement. It's awesome to be able to remember how flame breath works in Descent, or to know why 'got wood for sheep?' might be funny to someone (for the record, that is not funny to me). But when you can't enjoy a dumb game with your friends because you're unhappy with the unbalanced ruleset, you're taking it too far. When you can't enjoy the Pokemon Adventure Game with your kids because the collection mechanic is too clunky and the battle system too arbitrary, you need to remember why we play these damned things in the first place - to have fun.



Now, I'll be the first to tell you, not every game is fun for every player. Even more unfortunately, some games are just not fun at all (Monster Quest springs to mind). But even when you're not playing a game you like, you can still have fun. You can just say, 'hey, this isn't my bag, but I'm spending time with friends and/or family, enjoying some downtime, and playing a game. Life could be worse.' Play Candyland with your tots, and don't whine later to your gamer buddies that Candyland just has too much luck to be entertaining. Let your wannabe-game-nerd cousin teach you how to play Ticket to Ride. Maybe even let him win.


Throughout this whole rant so far, I've counted myself among the people I'm describing - I think the battle system in the Pokemon Adventure Game is arbitrary, and I hate Candyland for having too much luck. But there's one facet of the too-serious gamer that bugs the everlovin' horse apples out of me, and it's the rules lawyer. Nobody admits to being one - especially the rules lawyers - but if there was ever a gamer to avoid, it's the douchebag who overthinks the rules. Even if you love a game so much that you write strategy articles about it, or you start an Excel spreadsheet to organize your game collection by genre and game mechanic, you're still OK if you don't nitpick stupid crap about the rules to try to get an edge.



Because these damned things are supposed to be fun. I write this site to get free games, because I love playing games, because they're fun. I go to GenCon to play games, because it's fun. And nothing sucks all the fun out of a game like a gamer who takes them too seriously. Winning is only important because the fun is in trying to win. You don't prove larger manhood because you can whip my ass at Heroscape. You're not more awesome because you managed to win with the zombies in Last Night on Earth. Everyone comes out to have a good time, and the guy with the rod up his ass who takes his hobby too seriously sucks the fun out of a room like a ten-year-old sucking the blue juice out of a snow cone.



So lighten up, fanboy. Have fun, but remember that your hobby seems retarded to the little old lady up the street who collects Franklin Mint plates.

 

 

Image Gallery

Powered by JReviews
Comments (42)
  • avatarmikoyan

    Hear hear.

  • avatarmikelawson

    Good one, man. (Does that make me a fanboy?)

    --Mike L.

  • avatarMr. Bistro

    Good article. Drake's Flames provides some great reads as well.

  • avatarmikoyan

    I'd swear with some of the acrimony that floats around, you'd think we were talking politics or something and not games.

  • avatarStephen Avery
    Quote:
    I managed to offend some gay rights activists, some hardcore Euro gamers, and at least one Norwegian.

    Damn Norwegians!

    Quote:
    Because these things are supposed to be fun

    Blasphemy!! Games are obviously meant to demonstrate your mental superiority over another. I take my games very seriously, Sir. Very Seriously indeed.
    It is obvious by my complete mastery of Chaos Maruaders and Racer Knights of Falconus that I am force to be contended with and a mental giant amongst liliputians..

    Steve"ArrogantBastard"Avery

  • avatarMichael Barnes

    Well done Matt- both here at your blog, you've got some great stuff there.

    Here's the deal. I think games can and should be taken seriously as media. I think they should be subject to the same critical rigor and evaluation that any other medium is and that there are concepts such as genre and trends that can be used to define what it is we do for fun and to determine value.

    However, at the end of the day it's all about having fun. And really, if I have fun or not playing games it's almost 100% of the time because I'm hanging out with friends, goofing off, talking about movies, and enjoying the interaction that the game offers. I've played some of the most shit games ever published but had a complete blast because I was gaming with other people who understand that if you rely solely on game mechanics for entertainment, you're going to wind up staring at your player mat in GOA all night long.

    Beyond that, there's definitely people who take all this WAY too seriously on this fucking psycho level...and I think it has a lot to do with the fact that like most of the nerdly pursuits, this hobby attracts a lot of people who:
    - Got beat up in high school for being male and having the Pegasus trapper keeper
    - Have Asperger's Syndrome
    - Aren't able to socialize without an intermediary agent (like a board game)
    - Have a rampaging inferiority complex for whatever reasons causing them to hyperreact to comments, ideas, and opinions by assuming that they're somehow always personal
    - Use hobbies to vicariously experience life, thereby causing them to invest too deeply on an emotional level into entertainment outlets

    Now, if you just got offended by any of that, then you take this hobby too seriously, are likely in it for the wrong reasons, and need to lighten the fuck up. If you've ever been concerned or offended by any comment made online or in public about board gaming that wasn't openly racist, sexist, or homophobic then you need to lighten the fuck up.

    And if your idea of fun _is_ staring at the GOA board all night, that's great. I completely support your fun doing that. But I also think you may in fact be a fun murderer and I'll run you off from my table with a water hose if need be.

    There's so much whining and bitching about all these little trainspotting particulars (tight boxes, warped boards, bent swords, a minor typo, GROWING HUNGER, et al.) that these bastards who have hijacked the hobby with their anal grousing have made it seem like there's a body of people who are in this hobby not to have fun, but to generate for themselves a perfect, safe world in which a dented box corner or a slightly off-center card is a blemish and a blight that threatens the sanctity of Utopia. It's the same as when the AT thing got started- all of the sudden I think a lot of people felt like outsiders were marching on this idea of Shangri-La, where no one is ever offended, smiling cartoon avatars lead you away from CIVILIZATION and toward TRANSAMERICA, and "fun" means being a nitpicky stick-in-the-mud. I'm "concerned".

  • avatarmoofrank

    Tea is girly?

    Nah, not really. There is a boardgame that got released in Germany about marrying off your daughters in a Jane Austin kind of Edwardian time period. Comes in a bright pink box.

  • avatarMichael Barnes

    I hate to admit it, but I think that sounded kind of interesting in a literature nerd way...at least if there's mechanics to support the theme.

  • avatarmikelawson

    Mike, have you heard that there's an RPG out there using Jane Austen's novels as a setting?

    To me, that's incredibly scary.

    --Mike L.

  • avatarTedTorgerson

    Someguy1: OK Elizabeth will attempt to play Britannia on the piano.
    DM: Uh, okay but you have to take an ennui check first(rolls d20). Sorry you fail. You must retire to your bedroom. You will miss the picnic this afternoon with Mr Darcy.
    Someguy2: Oh that means I have a shot at Mr. Darcy now! I'll attempt to mount my horse sidesaddle and ride to his estate.
    DM: You must pass Mr. and Mrs. Bennet's permission check. (rolls d20) Okay you can go. Now you must pass a ridership ability check. (rolls again)Ouch! You fall from your mount. A twisted ankle my dear girl!
    Someguy2: Heavens!
    DM: ...and here approaches Bingley on his steed to save you.
    Someguy2: My hero! I will let him touch my ankle.
    DM: He tells you he thinks it's broken and he will ride to get a doctor.
    Someguy2: No stay, stay and ravish me! That means he has to marry me right?
    Someguy1: This sucks. Why does he get all the fun?

  • avatarMichael Barnes

    A bunch of guys cracking Jane Austen jokes. That's it, Ubarose, can you go ahead and pull the plug on this place? F:AT is done. :-(

  • avatarozjesting

    I feel CHEATED! I read this already!!! Now I am OUT one day of content on F:AT due to a repost from an admitted attention hog?!? I take READING ABOUT GAMES very seriously! I don't need to be linked and re-linked to the same content again and again! If you are too sleepy sir to provide me with the promised Friday content at your own site then for FUCKS SAKE don't screw this one up for me as well!

    ;)

  • avatarKen B.

    The Jane Austen RPG gets all screwed up when Keira Knightley becomes an NPC.


    During a key bodice-ripping scene:


    MUSTACHED GENTLEMAN: Verily! I thought thou wurst a lady?!

    KEIRA KNIGHTLEY: Indeed, good sir, I am.

    MUSTACHED GENTLEMAN: Then forsooth--where art thou chesticles?

    KEIRA KNIGHTLEY: I know not.

  • avatarjeb

    Yeees, quite. I love that Britishy quite. They hold that long-i sound just a touch too long. Awesome.

    I wanted to comment on "Lighten up, Francis." Great quote. In the gamer circles, however, I find myself using, "In deference to you, Kent, it's like lasing a stick of dynamite," more. Honestly--what isn't like lasing a stick of dynamite?

  • avatarMichael Barnes

    The British "quite" is one of the most dismissive things you could ever say. You may as well say "I really don't give a flying fuck you colonial pissant".

  • avatarRobertB

    This thread delivers, if by 'delivers' we mean, 'dries up what little testosterone I have left.'

    As for warped boards, the Railroad Tycoon boards were just out and out fucked up. This isn't rocket surgery, this is bookbinding technology that's been in use for literally centuries. The board that came with the $5 Chutes and Ladders that I bought for my little girl didn't look like a taco 5 minutes after I took it out of the box, so it doesn't seem like an unreasonable expectation to make of a $50 game. I'm not going to have a case of the vapors because of it, but if we're going to ooh and ahh over the bits then stuff like this ought to count.

  • avatarMichael Barnes

    Come on Robert, you have to use your imagination. We just used the RRT boards as half-pipes for those little finger skateboards and made it our very own BONES BRIGADE 3: THE SEARCH FOR ANIMAL CHIN board game.

    (Mike tries to salvage the thread before we start talking about what's on Oprah today)

    Oh, and Keira Knightley...it's not nice to make fun...she's one of the prettiest men I've ever seen.

  • avatarJoelCFC25

    Beyond that, there's definitely people who take all this WAY too seriously on this fucking psycho level...and I think it has a lot to do with the fact that like most of the nerdly pursuits, this hobby attracts a lot of people who:
    - Got beat up in high school for being male and having the Pegasus trapper keeper
    - Have Asperger's Syndrome
    - Aren't able to socialize without an intermediary agent (like a board game)
    - Have a rampaging inferiority complex for whatever reasons causing them to hyperreact to comments, ideas, and opinions by assuming that they're somehow always personal
    - Use hobbies to vicariously experience life, thereby causing them to invest too deeply on an emotional level into entertainment outlets

    http://homepage.mac.com/jeffnquinn/.Public/Gamers.jpg

  • avatarJoelCFC25

    Crap, I broke the page. Can someone delete my last post?

  • avatarMichael Barnes

    Two observations about that photo-

    1) They're playing in a hotel room, which is creepy and weird
    2) The "25" suggests that they're playing on christmas, which makes them even bigger losers

  • avatarInfinityMax

    Oh man! I wish I had the photo when I was writing the article! That's perfect!

    And I apologize to both of my readers for the repost. I'll try to make up for it tonight with jokes about foreign people with small feet.

  • avatarInfinityMax

    Barnes, I agree that, as a cultural phenomenon and artistic format, games should definitely be taken seriously. Hell, I take them seriously, enough that I lose a lot of sleep writing reviews, and even more playing Descent until everyone is bleary-eyed and yawning. But they're also meant to be fun, and people who over-analyze, nit-pick minor rules and get too upset at the winning or losing make them a burden. The same goes for other artistic mediums - the guy who gets too into a movie, to the point that he gets pissed when other people didn't like it, needs to get a little more sleep. And maybe a blowjob.

  • avatargoldenboat

    My experience is that gamers (like 99.9% of people everywhere) desperately need to feel smart and accepted. Gaming provides a clan where folks can develop an inflated sense of their own intelligence, worldliness, and security. So, if someone skewers one of their sacred cows, by pointing out that someone genuinely intelligent would understand the rules without asking obvious questions, or that being morbidly obese is a bad idea, or that playing a Euro doesn't qualify them to be the host of Masterpiece Theater ... well, that ruptures the false security bubble and you get emotional blowback out of all proportion to the original sleight (be it real or imagined). Combine this with the high functioning autistic/passive-aggressive personality type that inhabits the web and it is no surprise that running a review on BGG with even mildly critical content (especially if written with a "gonzo" style) is going to bring the grammar Nazis and the perpetually offended swarming from the shadows, howling for increased sensitivity and moderation.

    Those guys are never going to change.

    So your choices are to either go the Ned Flanders route and avoid criticizing anyone (and there is a robust thread going right now detailing the pitfalls of that approach), or to just generally not give a damn and post what you please ... but don't be surprised with the howls of indignation you will receive.

  • avatarJuniper
    Quote:
    1) They're playing in a hotel room, which is creepy and weird
    2) The "25" suggests that they're playing on christmas, which makes them even bigger losers

    What are they playing? Is it a fantasy league sports draft, or something? Who's to say that they won't all be having sex at 10:58PM? Fat, hairy, greasy, gamer man-sex?

  • avatarInfinityMax
    Quote:
    or to just generally not give a damn and post what you please ... but don't be surprised with the howls of indignation you will receive.


    That's the one I like. Those howls are half the fun.

  • avatarMichael Barnes

    That's what I think the milquetoasts don't get...it's fun to break the collective heart of the board game community by dropping soul-destroying, feeling-hurting nuclear bombs such as "I think this kind of game sucks" or "Greg Schloesser's reviews are lame".

  • avatarmoss_icon

    Why is it fun? It is, but it shouldn't be. It's shallow and pathetic. But it is fun! Especially when you get a passive-aggressive response.

    some guy - why are card drive games only about war?
    me - i can't wait for the cdgs where you have to impress the king etc etc
    b5 avatar guy - waffle waffle waffle you clearly dislike euros
    me - clearly!

  • avatarMichael Barnes

    My favorite is when people take some kind of moral high ground and then suggest that you're "_like_ a dickhead" or "_like_ an asshole".

    Yeah, it is shallow and pathetic because it's so easy. It's like stabbing a baby or recounting a lengthy anecdote making fun of a deaf guy in his presence. Or winning a paddleball tournament against a paraplegic.

    I've never seen any other hobby that felt more like a self-help group for the socially awkward and insecure.

  • avatarJuniper
    Quote:
    It's like stabbing a baby or recounting a lengthy anecdote making fun of a deaf guy in his presence. Or winning a paddleball tournament against a paraplegic.

    But is it like...
    ...a PILEDRIVER?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xci6AZnPADw

    Sorry. I'm in a silly Friday afternoon mood.

  • avatarInfinityMax
    Quote:
    My favorite is when people take some kind of moral high ground and then suggest that you're "_like_ a dickhead" or "_like_ an asshole".


    No doubt. Like it's your fault their favorite game is stupid, or has a lame theme, or has ugly pieces. Then they get all angry, and call you immature and hateful and mean. It's like fish in a barrel (though stabbing a baby is funnier). Man, the crap I took for panning Shadows Over Camelot kept me giggling for a week and a half.

  • avatarShellhead

    One guy dropped out of my boardgame group because I posted at BGG about how he made several trips to the bathroom every time he played boardgames at my place. In all seriousness, it was starting to bug my girlfriend how much he used our bathroom. And I didn't even mention at BGG that he used the word "poop" in about every third sentence when he talked at boardgame day. I wasn't mad, I just thought that it was funny.

    A mutual friend of ours tried to get him to come back for boardgame days, but I think he was holding out for a personal apology from me. I told the mutual friend that wasn't going to happen, because my sense of humor is what it is, and I'm not going to change it for the sake of one guy with a poop problem.

  • avatarmoofrank

    I still like Shadows over Camelot...but the released game is broken.

    Although I did not get a chance to play with the Merlin's Company expansion, I spent some time leafing through it and the cards. They did a nice job with it, adding a touch more wackiness without overburdening the game. The best idea is the possibility of a second Traitor with large groups.

    The travel and deck may actually speed up the game, as it adds enough extra unpredictability. (Along with that second Traitor.) The worst problem I've always had with Shadows is folks who manage to turn EVERY SINGLE TURN into a group discussion. With hugs.


  • avatarjeb

    I complained to the administrator about the "poop" post above. It offends my sensibilities no end, especially I as too confront the scourge of poop.

    Also, the post really exacerbates the sand in my vagina. PLEASE BAN HIM ALDIEKEN B!

  • avatarMichael Barnes

    Looks like we've got ourselves a complainer, boys!

    Jeb, you're banned for thirty days.

  • avatarSchweig!

    Who's Jane Austen?

  • avatarmoofrank

    Author of Pride and Prejudice, Sense and Sensibility, and Emma. Apparently great English novels that keep Keira Knightly, Emma Thompson, and Kate Winslet employed.

    Schwieg! any chance you've seen the game I'm referring to. I cannot remember the name or publisher. The box is an FX Schmid-size box and is vividly bright pink.

  • avatarKen B.

    JANE AUSTEN 3:16 SAYS I JUST WHIPPED YER ASS

  • avatarSchweig!

    Sorry Frank, I only remember this woman trafficking game from this year's Nuremberg toy fair: http://www.reich-der-spiele.de/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=124

    It's about a sultan only giving his daughters to the player who can amass the biggest treasure.

  • avatarSchweig!

    Oh you mean Liebe&Intrige ;D

  • avatarmoofrank

    Yeah. Liebe & Intrigue. http://www.boardgamegeek.com/image/257909

    Form the folks who've played it, it is hopelessly Euro and abstract. But girly.

  • Mr Skeletor

    Are those guys in the photo eating cerial at the game table?

Only registered users can write comments!
Text Size

Top