Front Page

Content

Authors

Game Index

Forums

Site Tools

Submissions

About

KK
Kevin Klemme
March 09, 2020
35151 2
Hot
KK
Kevin Klemme
January 27, 2020
20832 0
Hot
KK
Kevin Klemme
August 12, 2019
7420 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
December 19, 2023
3978 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
December 14, 2023
3502 0
Hot

Mycelia Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
December 12, 2023
2077 0
O
oliverkinne
December 07, 2023
2584 0

River Wild Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
December 05, 2023
2255 0
O
oliverkinne
November 30, 2023
2498 0
J
Jackwraith
November 29, 2023
3018 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
November 28, 2023
1973 0
S
Spitfireixa
October 24, 2023
3694 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
October 17, 2023
2625 0
O
oliverkinne
October 10, 2023
2461 0
O
oliverkinne
October 09, 2023
2290 0
O
oliverkinne
October 06, 2023
2507 0

Outback Crossing Review

Board Game Reviews
×
Bugs: Recent Topics Paging, Uploading Images & Preview (11 Dec 2020)

Recent Topics paging, uploading images and preview bugs require a patch which has not yet been released.

× Talk about the latest and greatest AT, and the Classics.

Ogre...Kickstarter...you in?

More
18 Apr 2012 19:31 - 18 Apr 2012 19:33 #123250 by SuperflyPete
Dukester, why the rant up top, man? My statement isn't overly grandiose. Let me put it like this.

If you look at the direction that all the companies are going, it's toward Kickstarter. It started with indie companies and now it's Queen, MayDay, and now, one of the oldest and most established companies EVER, Steve Jackson Games.

It's because they're not stupid. Why should they stick their necks out and drop 50K up front to make X margin, less warehousing and labor when they can simply tell everyone to pay up front, wait 6 months, and POOF, it's sold out?

There isn't a problem with that on its face. It's supply/demand at its finest. But what it does is encourage companies to start pushing the risk onto the consumer. Which also means that the consumer is the one who is going to get slaughtered when the product isn't any good.

There is no risk to the company other than reputation, and in the world of boardgames it's not hard for a company to say on the NEXT Kickstarter campaign "We sold 2,000 games in the FIRST WEEK!" or "30K funded in 2 days" to create a cycle of buzz.

Worst part is that it cuts out distribution completely, which in turn cuts out brick and mortars completely. I've heard much lamenting, handwringing, and gnashing of teeth about the beloved FLGSs taking it in the shorts and closing down, leaving the unwashed masses* nowhere to play anymore.

So, it DOES change things. It changes the entire model. There's no risk on the part of the developers, it undercuts the grassroots level of the business, and the most important thing is that (if you didn't notice) companies that go the Kickstart route charge the same money for a copy of a game as they otherwise would, BUT MAKE MORE MONEY! They don't pass savings onto consumers, and I know for a fact that if you buy 5000 copies of a game from Panda it's going to run you about 12.00-15.00 a game. Add shipping on discount, they're making 100-120% profit on a 40$ game.

You asked about risk? Go look up a Geeklist: "MayDay: A Cautionary Tale". There's plenty of examples right there. But there's also plenty more where companies shipped late, people got retail copies before the Kickstart people got theirs (and paid more)...and all kinds of other risk.

Consider this a risk as well: Company offers "exclusive" stuff. This adds value. Then, they give the same stuff away at GenCon (Alien Frontiers, Eminent Domain...). It just lowered the value of that "exclusive item". How about if you spend 50$ on a game and then it's sold at an OLGS (if they print more than the kickstarted quantity) for 35$. You paid to get it printed, and someone else got the discount.

So, there's a lot of risky things in all of these. I mean, why, with 1,000,000$ in new sales (THAT'S A LOT OF MUNCHKIN), with a net profit (Assumed) of 10% or 100,000, are they not paying for this themselves? Seriously? Because it's in THEIR interests to do so. The House at a casino has the odds stacked in their favor for a reason, just like we all do in every business we are in, collectively. So, you cannot argue to me with a straight face that Kickstarting a project isn't in a publisher's best interest at our expense...because they're DOING IT! :)


(*Gamers are one of the few groups that this much-used phrase actually applies to)
Last edit: 18 Apr 2012 19:33 by SuperflyPete.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Fallen

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 Apr 2012 19:38 - 18 Apr 2012 19:40 #123251 by Sagrilarus

VonTush wrote:

Bullwinkle wrote:

VonTush wrote: I'd bet the farm that more often than not a P500 program does generate a loan.

I have no idea if this is true; I'd actually be surprised if it was. But even if it is true, the loan is the company's obligation, not the customer's. They're still risking their own capital.


I'll stand by my betting of my hypothetical farm as say this is true. Companies receive lines of credit from banks. The amount of the credit line is largely determined by receivables. That's why you get issued a receipt with an order number and dollar amount. So unless I'm missing some GAAP rule a company could count that as receivables to expand their line of credit. And lines of credit are used to be able to pay large upfront costs for something (like a print run) where you won't receive payments for some weeks or months, but also don't disrupt payroll or day to day expenses.


Whoa whoa whoa -- don't miss his point. He's talking about the company borrowing money from the customer. That's what Kickstarter amounts to. Getting a loan from a bank or anyone else is a different matter entirely because it's collateralized in some fashion or another, money or otherwise.

If someone wants to micro-VC a no-name publisher (or worse an LLC that can declare bankruptcy and fold overnight) that's their business. Fundamentally your business survives on your reputation, and I have no doubt that businesses can develop a sterling reputation on Kickstarter. They can do it other ways, but Kickstarter is no different. Frankly, it's going to be a pretty solid piece of additional tchach to get me to sign on, but I won't rule it out.

I'll tell you where the real risky money is -- Kickstarter's IPO when it appears at some point in the future. These guys could be put out of business overnight by Amazon or eBay. My guess is they're hoping for an offer because there's just not a lot of tech (patentable or otherwise) in changing the pay structure on what essentially is a subcontracted P500.

S.
Last edit: 18 Apr 2012 19:40 by Sagrilarus.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Mr Skeletor, Bullwinkle

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 Apr 2012 19:42 - 18 Apr 2012 19:45 #123252 by SuperflyPete
About that "reputation" thing...if there's one thing I've learned in 20 years of business, it's that tenacity in denial can get you past a whole lot of bad press. I've watched some of my competitors lie through their fucking teeth while I was standing 10 feet from them, and would deny, deny, deny. And it works if the sales guy is slick enough.

I lost a 2MM dollar deal to a Toyota subcontractor (who is now out of business! SHOCKER!) because the sales guy baffled them with BS. The equipment was a month late, took 7 months to get working, and every time I asked the service guy what the problem was, his excuse was the same: "These guys don't want to take 'ownership' of the project" (read: customer needs handholding), which I knew was bullll-lll-lllshit from dealing with them for years.

So, Toyota pulled the plug, and so did Ford. And now your tire pressure sensors are made in Mexico instead of Zanesville, OH.

Just look at those pukes at MayDay. They are the poster child for habitual bad actors. Yet there they are, and there they shall remain.
Last edit: 18 Apr 2012 19:45 by SuperflyPete.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 Apr 2012 19:54 #123253 by VonTush
Oh, I didn't miss his point. I understand and agree with the point and didn't feel like it needed any further commentary. I was just clarifying why I felt the way that I did that PXXX amounts to a loan for a company via a line of credit.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 Apr 2012 19:59 #123254 by Sagrilarus
Most P500s don't bill until they ship. That's not a loan in my opinion since the product hits the mail the day they charge your card (or try to, and then spend the next three weeks trying to contact you for a revised expiration date.) Their up-front money (if they need it) needs to come from another source.

I believe Kickstarter bills when they hit their deadline? Is that correct?

S.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 Apr 2012 20:09 #123255 by TheDukester

SuperflyTNT wrote: You asked about risk? Go look up a Geeklist: "MayDay: A Cautionary Tale". There's plenty of examples right there. But there's also plenty more where companies shipped late, people got retail copies before the Kickstart people got theirs (and paid more)...and all kinds of other risk.

Good post, Pete, and here's a part I wanted to highlight. I'd still argue that my risk is very low (non-existent, really; it's not like SJG is going to suddenly flake out after 32 years of business) and that MayDay is an extreme outlier for Severe Douchebaggery.

Or, put another way: KS is just about the ultimate example of caveat emptor (arguably, that title might still got to eBay). I mean, would anybody seriously disagree with that? So, in the Ogre scenario (yuk-yuk), I think you get a lot of people like me who are A) wimpy, more or less; B) not always flush with cash, and C) comfortable seeing an old, familiar name to order from. We don't need to beware that much, as we're not ordering from that hypothetical punk band I mentioned ... or buying poetry from a slob who hasn't worked in 15 years ... or taking a flyer on backing proven thieves like Mayday. We're going with a familiar face; it's comfortable.

+++++

One thing I just realized, and I don't think it's been brought up yet: it's not like SJG is switching its business model or anything. Right now, this very minute, you could order how many in-print products through their normal channels? Forty, maybe? And how many game-related PDFs do they have up at their e23 store? Three hundred? More?

And how many SJG items are available through KS? ONE. Yet it's generating all this hysteria, including accusations of a lack of integrity and professionalism. Maybe it's time for a deep fucking breath here ...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 Apr 2012 20:13 #123256 by TheDukester

Sagrilarus wrote: I believe Kickstarter bills when they hit their deadline? Is that correct?

Right. "Funded" they call it. The money transfer happens then, all at once. Or nothing happens if the goal wasn't reached.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 Apr 2012 20:17 - 18 Apr 2012 20:18 #123257 by VonTush
Sag - I can't answer the KS payment timeline.

I agree with you. The loan money (if needed) comes from another source...I never said that the loan came from the customer pre-ordering direct. Add "from the bank" to my last line in my last post and it should make more sense.
Last edit: 18 Apr 2012 20:18 by VonTush.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 Apr 2012 20:38 - 18 Apr 2012 20:41 #123258 by SuperflyPete
Granted, Duke, I totally get what you're saying. Caveat Emptor is king in the uncharted desert that is Kickstarter.

But what I am saying is that the tide is turning. Last year it was Clever Mojo and Tasty Minstrel and other cleverly named indie companies. Now it's Queen and MayDay (they are slime, but established slime) and Steve Jackson.

The question is if tomorrow, FFG, MayFair, Rio Grande or other large companies will start realizing the miraculous benefits that the tremendous shift of the burden of the COST of doing business to the customer offers.

If I could do this shit, I'd do it in a New York Minute. Get a $20,000 unsecured line of credit to start a business based on.... A VIDEO THAT I PAY TOM VASEL TO MAKE?

It's magical.

If only I could figure out how to segue "have you ever wanted to play 'Mine A Million' for real? Well now you can!" into "Send me 50$ and you can get one silver-bearing* solder alloy ingot stamped with your own name!"

*Silver concentration may be between 0.0004-60%, depending on market value.
Last edit: 18 Apr 2012 20:41 by SuperflyPete.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
18 Apr 2012 21:12 #123261 by Fallen

Sagrilarus wrote: I'll tell you where the real risky money is -- Kickstarter's IPO when it appears at some point in the future. These guys could be put out of business overnight by Amazon or eBay. My guess is they're hoping for an offer because there's just not a lot of tech (patentable or otherwise) in changing the pay structure on what essentially is a subcontracted P500.

S.

This could be very interesting, and after seeing the Groupon & LinkedIn IPO's hit:
Groupon's epic slide into chapter 11 is all but confirmed ($26.11 original open to $12.04 close today) while LinkedIn's rollercoaster run($94.25 original open to $105.00 close today and a 52 wk low of $55.98)shows that no one is truly sold on the concept.
Looking forward to seeing how many greater fools jump on the FB IPO(May 16-24), the shiny new Instagram addition will increase the original $5B estimate.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Gary Sax
Time to create page: 0.550 seconds