Front Page

Content

Authors

Game Index

Forums

Site Tools

Submissions

About

KK
Kevin Klemme
March 09, 2020
35153 2
Hot
KK
Kevin Klemme
January 27, 2020
20834 0
Hot
KK
Kevin Klemme
August 12, 2019
7421 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
December 19, 2023
3978 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
December 14, 2023
3504 0
Hot

Mycelia Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
December 12, 2023
2078 0
O
oliverkinne
December 07, 2023
2584 0

River Wild Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
December 05, 2023
2255 0
O
oliverkinne
November 30, 2023
2498 0
J
Jackwraith
November 29, 2023
3018 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
November 28, 2023
1973 0
S
Spitfireixa
October 24, 2023
3696 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
October 17, 2023
2625 0
O
oliverkinne
October 10, 2023
2462 0
O
oliverkinne
October 09, 2023
2291 0
O
oliverkinne
October 06, 2023
2507 0

Outback Crossing Review

Board Game Reviews
×
Bugs: Recent Topics Paging, Uploading Images & Preview (11 Dec 2020)

Recent Topics paging, uploading images and preview bugs require a patch which has not yet been released.

× Talk about the latest and greatest AT, and the Classics.

Scoundrels

More
13 Jan 2015 13:44 #195005 by scissors
Replied by scissors on topic Re: Scoundrels
I like the illustration of the map but would prefer if the writing could all be read from one direction. top/bottom, not wrapping around.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 Jan 2015 15:17 #195019 by Gregarius
Replied by Gregarius on topic Re: Scoundrels
I like the map art!

Some suggestions after a quick read of the rules:
--Reduce hand size from 8 to 6.
--Change deck composition:
Instead of having three suits (swords, cannons, sails) and wilds, reduce it to just swords and cannons and make all cards work as sailing cards. With every card doing double duty, you could never draw a bum hand. You could always move and always attack. It then becomes your choice what to do, rather than dictated by your hand.

Having movement not dependent on card draws would probably speed up the game significantly. Plus, it would allow pirates to reach other areas of the map much faster.

I know you didn't ask for development suggestions, so you are welcome to completely dismiss these ideas.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 Jan 2015 16:57 - 13 Jan 2015 17:00 #195032 by randyo
Replied by randyo on topic Re: Scoundrels
Please do not hold back "unsolicited tough love"! That's how a game gets better, and how I get realistic about things. I may not enjoy hearing tough things, but I'd rather hear it now and get my game made than have a game that no one is willing to pay for. I'm going to need hundreds of people I don't know to give me $50 to make this happen. Always plan for worst-case.

In terms of specific game feedback, I would say that until you've played the game, I won't find much value in it. I've been tuning all these details for 2 years. Every change at this point is very particular, and a hand-size or card-type change is not happening. To respond specifically to removing the sail card, I'd say read the blog I wrote on F:AT a couple weeks ago. I like the 3-choice system of cards. And I actually would say there is almost too much choice now at times, especially for more casual players. It's a balance of decision-making, and Sail cards are useful for movement while also a backup choice in fights.

The 2-ships per player is a fascinating idea for 2-3 players! I will definitely be testing that out. It could maintain the chaos of a full board, though it may also be too confusing.

I'm also interested in maybe standups as a lower-cost alternate to ship models, so thank you guys for that idea! This is why I'm here.

Map writing: Yeah, I'm torn on how it is now. This new version of the map removed directionality for the most part, so all players get an equally beautiful view no matter the angle, but there might be value in maintaining some directionality. (I also ran out of room for the compass rose I drew. D'oh!)

Here's a maybe helpful breakdown of a battle. (Skip to 1:49 for the battle stuff) CRAPPY VIDEO WARNING
Last edit: 13 Jan 2015 17:00 by randyo.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Colorcrayons

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 Jan 2015 17:34 #195035 by SuperflyPete
Replied by SuperflyPete on topic Re: Scoundrels
What's with the card flipping? Why not just have each player build a hand and then show them all? (battle)?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 Jan 2015 17:58 - 13 Jan 2015 17:59 #195036 by randyo
Replied by randyo on topic Re: Scoundrels
Two reasons:
1. Fights are really fun as a crowd. Watching what's happening is actually quite exciting, largely because people only engage when they think they have a reasonable chance at winning. So battles are often pretty close.

2. Strategy. The defender may choose to back out of a battle. When a battle begins there are a bunch of unflipped cards. The attacking player is going to lose all of those cards whether they win or lose, but the defender, at any time during the battle, may choose to keep their unflipped cards. So if they uncover 2 attacking 3-cannons in a row, they may recognize they're not going to win, and keep any remaining defense cards. It's always 1 and 1. Both players reveal a card at the same time, and then the defender can choose to concede or keep going.

In addition, whenever a player is attacked, they get 1 free Action card when their hand isn't full. If they don't think they can win, they can concede the battle without playing any cards. This way, if I spend a bunch of cards and I know someone is going to both shoot and then board me, I can concede the first battle (take the loss) and get a free card, and then get another card and engage in the second battle when they're trying to board me.

The fun thing with certain strategic players is they know they can get away with this. So some players will shoot and you think you're going to get boarded after, so you take the damage, and then they sail off to do something else instead.
Last edit: 13 Jan 2015 17:59 by randyo.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 Jan 2015 10:16 #195071 by Gregarius
Replied by Gregarius on topic Re: Scoundrels

randyo wrote: In terms of specific game feedback, I would say that until you've played the game, I won't find much value in it. I've been tuning all these details for 2 years. Every change at this point is very particular, and a hand-size or card-type change is not happening.

Good luck with your game.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 Jan 2015 10:47 #195081 by SuperflyPete
Replied by SuperflyPete on topic Re: Scoundrels

randyo wrote: Two reasons:
1. Fights are really fun as a crowd. Watching what's happening is actually quite exciting, largely because people only engage when they think they have a reasonable chance at winning. So battles are often pretty close.

2. Strategy. The defender may choose to back out of a battle. When a battle begins there are a bunch of unflipped cards. The attacking player is going to lose all of those cards whether they win or lose, but the defender, at any time during the battle, may choose to keep their unflipped cards. So if they uncover 2 attacking 3-cannons in a row, they may recognize they're not going to win, and keep any remaining defense cards. It's always 1 and 1. Both players reveal a card at the same time, and then the defender can choose to concede or keep going.

In addition, whenever a player is attacked, they get 1 free Action card when their hand isn't full. If they don't think they can win, they can concede the battle without playing any cards. This way, if I spend a bunch of cards and I know someone is going to both shoot and then board me, I can concede the first battle (take the loss) and get a free card, and then get another card and engage in the second battle when they're trying to board me.

The fun thing with certain strategic players is they know they can get away with this. So some players will shoot and you think you're going to get boarded after, so you take the damage, and then they sail off to do something else instead.


Gotcha. That wasn't super clear in the video (I did Fast Forward to the point you noted, so maybe I missed it).

I'd buy this game, based solely on the art and theme, to be honest. It'd have to be like 30 bucks or less because it's a lot like Dread Pirate, almost like Dread Pirate "Advanced Edition" or something, and I happen to really like Dread Pirate. The art totally makes this. I don't like the cards very much, though.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 Jan 2015 12:05 - 14 Jan 2015 12:09 #195103 by randyo
Replied by randyo on topic Re: Scoundrels
I apologize, Gregarius, for being dismissive. That was not my intent. I feel a responsibility to lock certain elements down if I ever want to call the game finished and feel comfortable shipping it. I'm certainly biased, but I am at the core design I want except for two things: The game goes 15 minutes longer than I want, and the first thirty minutes are confusing for most new players because of each one-off balance rule.

There's a bunch of asymmetry in the game, and I kinda love how well it works. I'm testing new starting conditions to jump people forward more directly into the action part, but I also plan to leave in the "full" game as well. And then for rules teaching, egh, there's a balance between making the rules simpler for new players and maintaining the cool things going on right now in the game.

But the concerns raised in this thread are considerable; it puts to light all the realities of game design and creation. There are plenty of logistical decisions that will make this "not for someone". Cost, playtime, not into aggressive games, number of players needed, rules confusion. It's not a game that will be pulled out every other weekend because of those logistics. That's the game I've made. But I believe the audience is out there that would enjoy my game. I chose this site as my first foray into board game communities because the site named seemed appropriate to Scoundrels. I think many of y'all would like this. But time and Kickstarter will tell! The hope is people will buy it cause it's pretty, and then after playing it, will say: Oh, that was fun, too!

Dread Pirate was a direction inspiration! I bought Dread back in college but it just didn't do what I wanted. The collection of treasure and stealing it back and forth is definitely rooted there, but the inner workings of the game are completely gutted into something different. Good eyes. (You may notice in the pictures that I'm using various pieces from Dread Pirate! Namely the ships and tokens.)

And I am very ready to move on and make a new game. I already have the premise.
Last edit: 14 Jan 2015 12:09 by randyo.
The following user(s) said Thank You: SuperflyPete

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 Jan 2015 12:22 #195107 by SuperflyPete
Replied by SuperflyPete on topic Re: Scoundrels
Check into getting a rollable neoprene playmat, or better, cloth. I have a guy in Dayton who screen prints, and another guy who has an NC laser cutter for tokens and whatnot. PM me if you want contact info.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
14 Jan 2015 12:31 #195110 by VonTush
Replied by VonTush on topic Re: Scoundrels
If you are really open for advice here's what I'm thinking.

First, don't be so dismissive about opinion from people. Despite not playing your game, each one of us here has played scores of games and experienced scores upon scores of mechanics. Meaning, you've got nothing new that we haven't seen so we have a pretty solid understanding of what's going to likely happen during a game session.

That said, I like the core of what you have and I like the aesthetics and components. If the game goes up on Kickstarter for $35 or less, I'd be a likely backer. BUT, that's with the intention of basically pulling a gut-job on the game.
The following user(s) said Thank You: SuperflyPete

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Gary Sax
Time to create page: 0.292 seconds