Front Page

Content

Authors

Game Index

Forums

Site Tools

Submissions

About

KK
Kevin Klemme
March 09, 2020
35142 2
Hot
KK
Kevin Klemme
January 27, 2020
20818 0
Hot
KK
Kevin Klemme
August 12, 2019
7405 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
December 19, 2023
3967 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
December 14, 2023
3495 0
Hot

Mycelia Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
December 12, 2023
2074 0
O
oliverkinne
December 07, 2023
2582 0

River Wild Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
December 05, 2023
2250 0
O
oliverkinne
November 30, 2023
2494 0
J
Jackwraith
November 29, 2023
3014 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
November 28, 2023
1971 0
S
Spitfireixa
October 24, 2023
3692 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
October 17, 2023
2619 0
O
oliverkinne
October 10, 2023
2461 0
O
oliverkinne
October 09, 2023
2289 0
O
oliverkinne
October 06, 2023
2505 0

Outback Crossing Review

Board Game Reviews
×
Bugs: Recent Topics Paging, Uploading Images & Preview (11 Dec 2020)

Recent Topics paging, uploading images and preview bugs require a patch which has not yet been released.

× Talk about the latest and greatest AT, and the Classics.

Dust?

More
16 Jan 2008 13:35 #837 by Malloc
Dust? was created by Malloc
Has anyone played this one yet? What is the scoop?

-M

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jan 2008 13:38 #838 by Ken B.
Replied by Ken B. on topic Re:Dust?
It's damned pretty, I'll give it that. Malloc, you should bite the bullet, get a copy, and churn out a F:AT review. We're countin' on you, man!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jan 2008 14:07 #839 by Michael Barnes
Replied by Michael Barnes on topic Re:Dust?
It's pretty good. It's not great, but pretty good. It is to boardgaming what the film Commando is to motion pictures- good, dumb fun. Here's some random thoughts about it:

It's extremely straightforward, sort of a somewhat simplified rendition of the Gamemaster-style game with a kind of cool role selection/iniative/player powers thing on top of it. Every turn you play a card that dictates how many non-combat moves you can make, how many attacks, how many production points you get on top of what you've got on the board, and then a special power (including a nuke). It also sets up the turn order.

It's pretty basic all around. Units get a certain number of dice and you roll them- binary system, it's hit or miss. There's a simple order of battle wherein tanks have to get killed before mechs, fighters before bombers. There's also a tactical superiority thing where you can sometimes wipe somebody out before a counterattack.

The production system is basically a function of claiming power sources on the map and feeding them into your factories. So there's clear objectives on the board at all times.

It's VP system- you get VPs based on a few different things like any capitals you control, power sources, and so on but there's also majorities- you get points for having the most land units or most sea units for example. It works out pretty well because it keeps the game from going on too long since it's only got about 2.5 hours before it gets kind of dull.

The weird thing to me is that it's really very abstract. The backstory doesn't really inform the proceedings at all, no matter how many tanktopped ladies there are on the box. It feels strangely generic.

My pal Frank Branham believes that the game is a reworking of an older game called CONQUEST, and I believe he's right. Same designer- who, incidentally, designs Italian party games like KALEIDOS.

In all, it's fun but I think it's pretty expensive for what it is ($60 MSRP). It's very light and it's a good shoot-em-up that you could probably talk non-gamers into playing. It's not as innovative and smartly designed as NEXUS OPS and it's sort of old fashioned in a way. the first time I played it I kind of had a lower opinion of it, but playing it a few more times I realized that it's a good example of how a fun game doesn't necessarily have to be a brilliantly designed one. Just don't take it too seriously and make sure to roll the dice in the lid of the box and you'll have a good time.

Side note- there's two rulebooks, one for an "Epic" Version and one for a "Premium" Version. The Epic version is longer without any justifiable additions to gameplay- it really just kind of tweaks how you move and score points. The Premium version is the one to go with- it's a little over 2 hours with six players and packs pretty much everything you want out of it into a reasonable package.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jan 2008 15:42 #852 by mikelawson
Replied by mikelawson on topic Re:Dust?
I was wondering about that game. My first thought was that the game should have been called "Bust" based on the cover artwork. My next thought was whether those busty chicks are actually integral to any part of the game or not, because it looked like a cheesecake version of the old Axis and Allies box cover. At least the A&A cover had recognizable WW2 personalities on it.

--Mike L.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jan 2008 15:51 #855 by Michael Barnes
Replied by Michael Barnes on topic Re:Dust?
DUST does too...that's Lexus Stalin and Bunny Hitler on the box. Don't you recognize them?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jan 2008 17:43 #861 by Mr Skeletor
Replied by Mr Skeletor on topic Re:Dust?
What's wrong with big tits?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jan 2008 17:56 #864 by Michael Barnes
Replied by Michael Barnes on topic Re:Dust?
According to Milquetoast: The Quarterly Journal of Board Game Morality, September 13 2001:

"...breasts of any size, depicted on board game components, boxes, or in internet discussions cause far too much excitation of the bodily humours and could interfere with proper strategic reasoning in the minds of boardgamers and cause concern in the minds of those seeking to play games with the elderly or the very young...cranky old men are far more appropriate to the interests of the rank-and-file spieler, and as such depictions of "sexy" women should be avoided at all costs for fear that they may see, with their illustrated eyes, the board gamer's lackadaisical approach toward style, hygiene, and personal grooming and cause an embarassment."

That sum it up for you?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jan 2008 18:11 #866 by jeb
Replied by jeb on topic Re:Dust?
Michael Barnes wrote:

According to Milquetoast: The Quarterly Journal of Board Game Morality, September 13 2001:

"...breasts of any size, depicted on board game components, boxes, or in internet discussions cause far too much excitation of the bodily humours and could interfere with proper strategic reasoning in the minds of boardgamers and cause concern in the minds of those seeking to play games with the elderly or the very young...cranky old men are far more appropriate to the interests of the rank-and-file spieler, and as such depictions of "sexy" women should be avoided at all costs for fear that they may see, with their illustrated eyes, the board gamer's lackadaisical approach toward style, hygiene, and personal grooming and cause an embarassment."

That sum it up for you?

Goddammit, I can't believe you got banned from BGG. I need this sort of thing to get posted over there. Fuck a duck. I think plenty of folks crave this sort of talk about games and gaming (and things gamine) but they won't be finding it over there any time soon. If someone reviewed Dust and mentioned that there are a lot more titties on the box than there are in the gameplay; there'd be a riot or something.

Thanks for the mini review--this game looked too pretty to be any good.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jan 2008 18:25 #868 by Michael Barnes
Replied by Michael Barnes on topic Re:Dust?
But it is pretty good!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jan 2008 18:41 #872 by Mr Skeletor
Replied by Mr Skeletor on topic Re:Dust?
Jeb has been on BGG too long, you know where 99 good things get trumped by 1 bad thing.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jan 2008 20:21 #875 by mikelawson
Replied by mikelawson on topic Re:Dust?
Mr Skeletor wrote:

What's wrong with big tits?


Actually, nothing. And I don't mind if my wife reads this, either; she'd agree that I have no problem with them.

--Mike L.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jan 2008 20:23 #877 by mikelawson
Replied by mikelawson on topic Re:Dust?
Michael Barnes wrote:

According to Milquetoast: The Quarterly Journal of Board Game Morality, September 13 2001:

"...breasts of any size, depicted on board game components, boxes, or in internet discussions cause far too much excitation of the bodily humours and could interfere with proper strategic reasoning in the minds of boardgamers and cause concern in the minds of those seeking to play games with the elderly or the very young...cranky old men are far more appropriate to the interests of the rank-and-file spieler, and as such depictions of "sexy" women should be avoided at all costs for fear that they may see, with their illustrated eyes, the board gamer's lackadaisical approach toward style, hygiene, and personal grooming and cause an embarassment."

That sum it up for you?


::applause::

Of course, Dungeon Twister and the old Mayfair Settlers box cover probably caused much titilation, but oh well.

--Mike L.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jan 2008 21:15 #883 by jeb
Replied by jeb on topic Re:Dust?
I have some pretty limited entertainment hours--I need some cream of the crop stuff. This one won't cut it, given the "more of the same, except for more $$$".

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
16 Jan 2008 22:02 #890 by mikelawson
Replied by mikelawson on topic Re:Dust?
jeb wrote:

I have some pretty limited entertainment hours--I need some cream of the crop stuff. This one won't cut it, given the "more of the same, except for more $$$".


You know what someone needs to do? Make a game titled "Attack of the 50ft Woman: Busen Memo Edition".

--Mike L.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
17 Jan 2008 11:11 #938 by Malloc
Replied by Malloc on topic Re:Dust?
ok I played it last night and I think Barnes is being kind.... Dust did absolutely nothing for me. It as much of an AT re-hash as pillars of the Earth is a Euro re-hash. I would pay for the game and I might play it again but only if other games were not available. It fills poorly the same whole as Nexus ops fills so well. It doesn't even strike me as any better then the many new versions of risk floating around out there and I totally do not feel like the theme is in there at all. I was playing with some Sci-fi 1930's looking units on a generic map of the globe....been there and had more fun with other games...

The game looked good, units were nice artwork was pretty good... i dig the puzzle map but game play just was average.

-M

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Gary Sax
Time to create page: 0.145 seconds