Articles Reviews Ikusa - Boardgame Review
 

Ikusa - Boardgame Review Ikusa - Boardgame Review Hot

Ikusa - Boardgame Review

A long time ago (well, a long time ago in Internet years) I reviewed Shogun, the old 1984 Gamemaster Series game where everyone sets out to conquer feudal Japan using samurai soldiers and peasants carrying antique firearms. The summary was that I liked it, but couldn't describe the ending because I was never able to finish a game. I even took it to GenCon and set up for a marathon 5-player game, and then one of my pinhead friends spilled a rum and coke on it. We got it cleaned up, but we didn't try to play again, probably so that I didn't throttle my friend or try to stab him with the little plastic swords. 

Happily, Wizards of the Coast decided I needed another excuse to try it again, and so they reprinted the game again. (This is the second reprint. The first reprint was called Samurai Swords, and happened about 15 years ago.) They made it even more gorgeous than the first one, but used the same rules. Hey, if it ain't broke, don't fix it, I guess. 

In order to differentiate the new, incredibly-gorgeous version of the game from the old, somewhat-less-gorgeous version, they renamed it Ikusa. They chose the name primarily so it would be confused with a Swedish furniture manufacturer, and it worked. When I first opened the game, I expected to see language-independent instructions and a box full of pressboard and metal screws. I was happy to see a game inside, though I still need a stylish and trendy way to store Hustler back issues. 

The rules for Ikusa are pretty easy, although there will be enough of them to make you spend half an hour explaining them, and even then someone at the table will still try to assassinate your general on his first turn. If you've played any number of what the Fortress AT guys call 'dudes on a map' games, all the movement and battling and what-not will be pretty easy to follow. So if you're trying to figure out if you should buy Ikusa, then what you need to know is what makes it different from any other world conquest game. 

The biggest difference between Ikusa and other land-grab battle games is that the map is very linear. Understanding how the map affects tactics and strategy is painfully important to doing well at this game, because it can be more important to hole up at either end of the map than to try and hold territories you can't reinforce. If you're stuck in the middle, you'll be fighting a two-front war, and that's rarely a very good idea. Ask the Germans how it worked out for them. 

Another thing that sets Ikusa apart from the masses is the fact that you really only get three armies. You can have provincial forces, but these can be, at most, five guys, and a solid army will plow them under like a fall harvest. That means that you have to really consider defense and offense at the same time, unlike many games where the best defense is a good kick in the family jewels (in fact, you may be surprised at how often that's a good defense. Try it the next time your boss asks why you're late to work. Bet he doesn't ask that one again!). When you only have three serious threats, determining how to use them is critically important. Waste them or put them in the wrong place, and you'll be setting yourself up to fail. Or maybe get one of those nut kick defenses. 

You've also got ronin, which are surprise forces that can be deployed anywhere, secretly, but only stick around for the turn you hire them. That makes it tricky to use them properly, but they can seriously turn the tide when you're worried about an opponent's aggressive stance. Throw in a ninja who can spy on your enemies or kill their generals, and you've got an exciting, old-fashioned mud-stomp of a board game. 

Of course, since Ikusa is a large-scale war game, there's no way you'll finish in an hour. You might finish in three, if you're fast and someone runs away with an early lead, but you really should plan on being there a while once you set up. Everybody needs to remember to use the bathroom before the game starts, for example, and don't start if you're hungry. Under no circumstances should you allow rum and coke at the table, unless you're prepared to stab someone with an actual samurai sword. Especially if the creator of the game signed your copy less than an hour before the drink-spilling incident, and it's a 25-year-old classic collectible that is going to smell like cane sugar and booze until ants carry it out of your office so they can have a party in the box lid. 

Everything about Ikusa is a visual improvement on the original Shogun, with two notable exceptions. First, the old game used to include a big styrofoam bin for storing the coins and castles and samurai and stuff. The new ones has a cardboard box. That's not as cool. Second, and this is important, there are no swords. 

The original Shogun had players bidding for turn order, and if you won, you collected the first-player sword. Other players would get other swords, and the sword you had told people when you would go. There were these little stands that held the sword out in front of you. It was completely unnecessary, but totally awesome. And the new game does not have swords. It has cardboard diamonds with numbers on them. That is not as cool. In fact, I would go so far as to say that it is not cool at all. 

If you have the original Shogun, or the reprint called Samurai Swords, there's not much reason to get Ikusa, outside the fact that it is incredibly easy on the eyes. The art is just plain fantastic, and the components are higher in quality than the original, but there are no differences in the rules, and the game will play exactly the same. However, if you're having trouble finding an older version of this great classic game, or if you don't mind the missing swords, then this reprint could be exactly what you need. If you want to stomp around a big map, hiring armies and spilling the blood of tiny plastic soldiers, Ikusa is one hell of a fun way to get it done. 

Summary

2-5 players 

Pros:
Lots of innovative additions to one of my favorite kinds of game 
Just plain gorgeous 
Brilliant and strategic, with all the stuff you love about war 

Cons:
Linear map can punish the unlucky or unwise 
I wish it still had those bitchin' swords

Powered by JReviews
Comments (23)
  • jasonwocky

    When I heard about the missing swords it totally broke my heart

  • avatarMsample

    No swords, no sale.

  • avatarDair

    Two-player is not good, as much as I wish it were.

  • avatarKen B.

    Personally, I can't believe they went to all this trouble to produce this so lavishly (and expensively!) and skimped out on the swords. What would it have been, 5 more bucks at MOST? C'mon.

    Those swords (and the ninja) were the icons of the original game.

  • avatarDair

    Completely agree on the swords. That was the first thing my old roommate mentioned when I told him about the reprint. He looked broken-hearted when I told him that if he bought the reprint, there would be no swords.

  • avatarwaddball

    I wasn't going to buy this anyway (great game, used to own it, but a really hard sell in terms of time and required # of players), but no swords? Wow.

    At least it has the koku and the ninja. And I really like the graphics and the plastic bases. I am surprised that they did nothing to speed up the game (something as simple as a "late game" scenario doesn't seem all that hard to come up with).

  • avatarKen B.

    My main deal with Samurai Swords these days is that after you've played games with cards in them to spice things up, Samurai Swords starts to feel like rinse, wash, repeat.

    It is my favorite combat system, bar none. But Nexus Ops does the tiered combat system almost just as well...and plays in a third of the time.

    I've traded off Samurai Swords twice over the past five years, once my original copy and another I found at a flea market. To be honest, I don't miss it too much. Great memories, but sort of obsolete now.

  • avatarjeb

    I smell a Kickstarter opportunity: Samurai swords for IKUSA! Both people that buy this game will want them!

    PeteflyTNT, I am putting you in charge.

  • avatarPrivateMeggido  - No swords! Heretical.

    I would venture to say that the no-sword issue is probably due to how difficult is to get a game approved for international distribution when it has pointy elements of a certain size.

  • avatarHatchling

    I'm assuming people are being tongue and cheek about the swords "issue".

  • avatarThirstyMan

    I'm not being tongue in cheek, when I say I won't buy unless there are plastic (or real) swords.
    For true F:ATies, the bits are as important as the gameplay.

  • avatarscissors

    Have to chalk this up as serious cases of sword envy.

  • avatarHatchling

    That's silly, Andy. Matt mentioned that in all other respects the components are better than in previous editions, and that means they convey the atmosphere that gives the gameplay some colour. If despite all that you are serious about the lack of swords being a deal breaker (swords which in earlier versions were so difficult to read anyway that they were almost useless), it sounds to me that you're more interested in getting a toy than a game. I have nothing against that, but I'm just saying that a game is more than just a toy. And even if the game did have swords, by your thinking it'd make more sense to just buy some plastic swords and ninja pijamas somewhere rather than fork out the extra cash for an actual boardgame.

  • avataredulis

    I just played a game of Shogun last month went from 10pm to 3 am and then we gave up. Two of us were down to one army and two had two, the fifth player still had all three, but they were puny and he had very few territories.

    We were doing Sake shots when you either lost or killed an army. Good times.

    I agree about the swords, they are great to play with while waiting for your turn to throw some dice. Speaking of any game that actually uses the seldom used D12 gets some automatic points.

  • avatarInfinityMax

    The swords are really not a big deal. It's easier to read the big numbers on cardboard tokens. The swords were nearly impossible to read. They were fun, but they were not even remotely necessary to make the game entertaining. In fact, they actually made it harder to play. The best solution would be to actually paint the dots on the swords.

    And seriously, you could find plastic swords somewhere else. I just did a quick Google search and found a bunch. If the swords are really a deal-breaker (and they should not be), you can replace them.

    Or you could just play Shogun. It's a hell of a fun game, no matter which version you have.

  • avatarNotahandle

    Good review, thanks. But no swords = blasphemy! Does seem a daft decision. But PrivateMeggido's probably right: too much hassle to license the pointy bits.

    Oh, and for your Hustler collection, see Ikea's Pröjn bookcase.

  • avatarMr MOTO

    I believe you have answered the riddle of the name change for us, Matt.

    It can't be Samurai Swords without the swords, so they changed the name to International Karate USA -- aka IKUSA

    I'd buy this if I didn't have a mint copy of SS on my game shelf... it looks great, and yes, I'd find some swords for it too to pimp it up.

  • briseman

    I'm gonna grab this game, and then grab some of these - http://www.karatemart.com/small-plastic-samurai-sword

  • avatarmikoyan

    I'm glad I still have my copy of Samurai Swords.

  • avatarInfinityMax

    Brise, that's perfect! Just what I'm talking about.

  • avatarNotahandle

    Briseman: Don't forget the Ninja Rubber Ducks from the same company!

Only registered users can write comments!
Text Size

Top