Front Page

Content

Authors

Game Index

Forums

Site Tools

Submissions

About

KK
Kevin Klemme
March 09, 2020
35697 2
Hot
KK
Kevin Klemme
January 27, 2020
21184 0
Hot
KK
Kevin Klemme
August 12, 2019
7700 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
December 19, 2023
4846 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
December 14, 2023
4201 0
Hot

Mycelia Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
December 12, 2023
2635 0
O
oliverkinne
December 07, 2023
2887 0

River Wild Board Game Review

Board Game Reviews
O
oliverkinne
December 05, 2023
2546 0
O
oliverkinne
November 30, 2023
2835 0
J
Jackwraith
November 29, 2023
3382 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
November 28, 2023
2407 0
S
Spitfireixa
October 24, 2023
4046 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
October 17, 2023
3082 0
Hot
O
oliverkinne
October 10, 2023
2556 0
O
oliverkinne
October 09, 2023
2530 0
O
oliverkinne
October 06, 2023
2729 0

Outback Crossing Review

Board Game Reviews
×
Bugs: Recent Topics Paging, Uploading Images & Preview (11 Dec 2020)

Recent Topics paging, uploading images and preview bugs require a patch which has not yet been released.

× Talk about the latest and greatest AT, and the Classics.

WORLD WAR IV

More
04 Jun 2009 10:00 #31354 by Michael Barnes
WORLD WAR IV was created by Michael Barnes
The fine folksat Ziggurat Games sent me a promo copy of WORLD WAR IV and since there's practically nothing about it online yet I thought I'd give F:AT my world-exclusive rules/components review. I'm going to do a full feature at Gameshark, of course, but consider this a pre-play look at the game to figure out if it's something you might want or not.

The game's concept makes me laugh. It's fun. I mean, what about WWIII? It's post-apocalyptic, and there is some originality to it but like most DoaM games it's more abstract than it lets on.

Production is not bad for a first release from a small publisher. The art is all done by Mark Poole, famous for his MAGIC artwork. It's very CGI looking and has lots of that Kojima-style facial hair. It's weird, because the box art looks all modern but then it has this cheese-ass logo. Other production elements range from poor (B&W player mats that look like amateur hour with MS Word, thin-stock chits and cards) to pretty good (400 plastic dudes in five colors, a nice big mounted board, and a decent rulebook complete with a cornball fluff story).

One thing is abundantly clear, this is old-fashioned DoaM. No hybridization, no Euro mechanics whatsoever, player elimination, no way to streamline things, and the box tells you up front that its 4-6 hours. Reading through the rules, it's definitely in the vein of the Gamemaster stuff. Build dudes, move dudes, fight other dudes, win the game.

There's a few ways to win. You've got an on-board king figure that can be assassinated (and protected) by spies. Lose him, and you're fetching chips and drinks. It's the whole TITAN thing. You can also win by taking over everybody else's capital cities. There's also kind of a deadman's switch ending where if the event deck runs out and you have to draw, you roll a die for each city. If you get a six, your people rediscover atomic weapons and nuke everybody else. It sounds cool at first, but it's kind of a stupid way to end a 4-6 hour game.

Combat is pretty much exactly what you'd expect but it has rout results involved. Land, sea, and air are present.

One wrinkle is this random events deck. Generally bad stuff comes out of it. There are technology cards too, and one thing I thought was kind of cool was that you roll for each innovation card on your turn. On a certain result, the tech becomes common knowledge for all players.

The map is big and shows the world. Old timey. Each territory produces dollars and food. Food is required to support the troops in a region, and if you have excess you might face starvation by (wait for it) rolling a die.

At first, I was thinking "trainwreck" because I was reminded a little too much of BLOOD FEUD IN NEW YORK but I think I was just being a negative nelly. The game could be fun. It's really easy, it's the kind of thing a group of friends could pick up at the FLGS on a saturday afternoon and spend the rest of the night playing. A couple of the idiosyncracies might make for a pretty fun time. What remains to be seen is if they add a lot to the game or not or if this turns out to not have enough differentiators to warrant existing. It's definitely a far cry from radical DoaM games like STARCRAFT. A throwback, if you will.

We'll see how it goes...it's the perfect game for Pseudointellectual and his crew, and I'll probably rope Branham and the other Inglorious Bastards in on a game.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Jun 2009 10:43 #31355 by mikoyan
Replied by mikoyan on topic Re:WORLD WAR IV
Sounds interesting except for the ending a game on a die roll thing....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Jun 2009 10:45 #31356 by Shellhead
Replied by Shellhead on topic Re:WORLD WAR IV
Michael Barnes wrote:

One wrinkle is this random events deck. Generally bad stuff comes out of it. There are technology cards too, and one thing I thought was kind of cool was that you roll for each innovation card on your turn. On a certain result, the tech becomes common knowledge for all players.


Overall, it looks and sounds like a trainwreck, but the tech becoming common knowledge is a cool twist. However, I think that idea is more suited to a civ game than a DOAM game. Come to think of it, the event cards sound straight out of Civilization, though thematically, I think they could work just as well in a post-Apocalyptic DOAM game like this.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Jun 2009 10:55 #31359 by Michael Barnes
Replied by Michael Barnes on topic Re:WORLD WAR IV
Well, that's something where I don't think the design is going to go far enough. The idea is cool- basically, humanity has to reclaim all these techs lost in WWIII. So it's kind of supposed to be a lead-up to a civilization rediscovering nuclear weapons. That's a pretty great idea for civ game, but yeah, probably not so much a DoaM game.

As for the endgame thing...yeah, I think that's going to be crap. The thing is, you'd probably never roll more than 1-2 dice for it. There's only five cities. But still, "Hey, a 6! I win!"...OMG the Eurogamers were right! :-O

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Jun 2009 10:59 #31361 by Ska_baron
Replied by Ska_baron on topic Re:WORLD WAR IV
Oh, and just how tiny are those tanks?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Jun 2009 11:07 #31364 by Michael Barnes
Replied by Michael Barnes on topic Re:WORLD WAR IV
That's SUPERPOWERS that has those really small tanks. These are about A&A size. The minis are pretty good, mostly custom. Although I'm not sure how P-38s survived World War III.

You do get a bag of black and white poker chips with the game though. HIGH CLASS

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Jun 2009 12:08 #31371 by Sagrilarus
Replied by Sagrilarus on topic Re:WORLD WAR IV
I'd be curious to know how often that event deck is used up so that the nuke roll can even happen. It could be a kill switch for a stalemate game (and everyone might be pleased) or perhaps a Hail-Mary strategy for someone that is on the ropes. Do you have the ability to make drawing cards more likely, or is it something where everyone draws at the start of their turn? If the player is giving up options for other progress the nuke roll may be a reasonable risk, for both the nuker and the nukee.

Are the rules online?

Sag.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
04 Jun 2009 13:08 #31374 by Michael Barnes
Replied by Michael Barnes on topic Re:WORLD WAR IV
It's a once-per-turn thing. Shoot, I can't remember if it's once per player turn or once per round. Don't have the rules right here with me.

Actually, Sag, you've already made me think of a cool variant. When the deck runs out, nuclear war starts. Every turn the player rolls the dice and for every six gets to knock another player completely out of the game. The more cities you have, the better your odds. But an upstart can decide to nuke you, too. It's kind of a SUPREMACY ending, I guess, with everybody blowing each other to bits, but that could be fun.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
05 Jun 2009 09:55 #31437 by Aarontu
Replied by Aarontu on topic Re:WORLD WAR IV
Sounds pretty cool. A good old fashioned DOAM game with a cool theme and sweet plastic bits. I'd totally be interested if I did't already have a closet full of 'em.

Photos of the pieces and the board are up at zigguratgames.com/ for anybody who wants to see it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
05 Jun 2009 10:18 #31441 by Shellhead
Replied by Shellhead on topic Re:WORLD WAR IV
You could make the game shorter by randomly removing part of the event deck.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
05 Jun 2009 11:51 #31457 by Jason Lutes
Replied by Jason Lutes on topic Re:WORLD WAR IV
I know I'm going to get my F:AT membership card revoked for this, but what does "DoaM" stand for? Google's got nothin'.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
05 Jun 2009 11:55 - 05 Jun 2009 11:57 #31458 by Sagrilarus
Replied by Sagrilarus on topic Re:WORLD WAR IV
"Dudes on a Map"

Jeeze, it's been in common usage for ten days now -- where the hell have you been?

fortressat.com/index.php?option=com_mybl...ing-.html&Itemid=240

Sag.
Last edit: 05 Jun 2009 11:57 by Sagrilarus.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
05 Jun 2009 12:03 #31460 by Schweig!
Replied by Schweig! on topic Re:WORLD WAR IV
No clubs?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
05 Jun 2009 12:22 #31462 by Aarontu
Replied by Aarontu on topic Re:WORLD WAR IV
Someone's uploaded some photos on the BGG:



The board looks rather bland, but all the pieces look great.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
05 Jun 2009 12:56 #31466 by Michael Barnes
Replied by Michael Barnes on topic Re:WORLD WAR IV
The "C" looking number in the boxes is the money the territory generates, the bottom "F" is the food (i.e. stack limit).

The green and purple areas are the starting zones for the African and Arabian nations, respectively.

One thing that's kind of nice is that each area lists the starting units (by color, too) that go there. At first, I saw in the rulebook this two page chart that listed them and had a head-slapping moment, thinking about how I was going to be calling out units and somebody else was going to be putting them down. For thirty minutes. But then I saw they were just printed on the board. Smart move.

It is a very dull-looking map...but yeah, the pieces are good. 11 different units. Greys are barbarian/neutrals.

1 spelling error on the map- "Deseret"

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: Gary Sax
Time to create page: 0.309 seconds