So glad the sheep have been vacated

I just read Diane's post over on the other site. It is amazing there is very little venom there. The members seem to be castrated and very sedate.

BGG should be happy, this is what they always wanted.

Y'all keep talking like there's some other site where you can talk about board games and the board games hobby...F:AT is the only place I know of, other than Boardgamenews.com and from my experience that place is more like an NPR show than a public forum- lots of soft, polite conversation and occasional gentle chuckling.

Michael Barnes wrote:

Y'all keep talking like there's some other site where you can talk about board games and the board games hobby...F:AT is the only place I know of, other than Boardgamenews.com and from my experience that place is more like an NPR show than a public forum- lots of soft, polite conversation and occasional gentle chuckling.

I think maybe they mean this .

Where's my FAT Down group?!

Juniper wrote:

Michael Barnes wrote:

Y'all keep talking like there's some other site where you can talk about board games and the board games hobby...F:AT is the only place I know of, other than Boardgamenews.com and from my experience that place is more like an NPR show than a public forum- lots of soft, polite conversation and occasional gentle chuckling.

I think maybe they mean this .

Awesome! What an elegant design. I'd have to say this is one of the better games in the ninja turtle canon.

Michael Barnes wrote:

Y'all keep talking like there's some other site where you can talk about board games and the board games hobby...F:AT is the only place I know of, other than Boardgamenews.com and from my experience that place is more like an NPR show than a public forum- lots of soft, polite conversation and occasional gentle chuckling.

Sssshhhh. S'ok lil Mikey. It was all just a bad dream.

I had that ninja turtles game!
I thought it was awesome!

I found it to be rather flawed, deeply broken and the luck element meant that the number of strategic decisions per time unit was low. Clearly, this was a game that was not properly playtested and I'm a bit concerned about the component quality. I rate it a 3.4443355. But it was dripping with theme and I would recommend it for play with girlfriends.

Michael Barnes wrote:

I found it to be rather flawed, deeply broken and the luck element meant that the number of strategic decisions per time unit was low. Clearly, this was a game that was not properly playtested and I'm a bit concerned about the component quality. I rate it a 3.4443355. But it was dripping with theme and I would recommend it for play with girlfriends.

But it had a dice flipper!!!